Horizontal shale completions require multi-stage high-pressure hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatments in order to deliver commercially viable production in low permeability reservoirs. Unconventional shale plays, such as the Eagle Ford and Haynesville Shale, often can require stimulation treatments that must be implemented in high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) conditions. Typically, these wells are completed with long casing strings, and it is critical that these monobore casing strings withstand high injection pressures as well as maintain mechanical integrity during thermal contraction/expansion. So what happens when the pre-frac casing pressure integrity pressure test fails? What is the “fix” that will allow treatments to be pumped at high pressure and rate? How will frac stages be isolated during the completion? Typically, remediation techniques have included everything from casing patches and expandable casing to coiled tubing completions. Unfortunately, these solutions can have pressure limitations, and in addition, can be cost prohibitive.
The authors of this paper will discuss how design of a 4-in. tie-back string with flush joint connections equal to the properties of the casing was capable of repairing a 5-1/2-in. monobore production casing that experienced extensive casing failure. The extremely small annular tolerance did not allow a conventional packer assembly or cementing for pressure isolation; thus, swellable packer technology was used to anchor the casing in place. A special flow-thru frac plug was designed so that it could be pumped through the 4-in. tie-back casing and set in the 4-1/2-in. lateral, allowing a plug-and-perf fracture completion to be performed. The stimulation treatments were pumped to completion and demonstrated 1), that the pressure isolation integrity of the casing system was satisfactory; and 2), that the flow-thru frac plugs could maintain isolation between stimulation treatments. This wellbore was in the Eagle Ford Shale. True vertical depth (TVD) was ~13,000 ft, bottomhole temperature (BHT) was ~325°F with a 0.95 psi/ft frac gradient, and surface pressures exceeded 10,000 psi during the stimulation treatments.
To read the full paper please visit: https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPE-162852-PA
Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 30 October–1 November 2012.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.